Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-4556650-20140419103731/@comment-5912473-20140423131103

I agree with Unok. I think "Old Warrior" is descriptive enough. There's really no need for the "unnamed" part, considering he's referred to as the "old warrior" in text. On the other hand, I've never been a fan of "Andre's partner " as the title for the article of the unnamed apprentice.